A federal judge threw out a major Trump campaign lawsuit in Pennsylvania, issuing a blistering opinion refusing to disenfranchise 7 million voters

rudy giuliani

Summary List Placement

A federal judge on Saturday declined to disenfranchise roughly 7 million voters in the state of Pennsylvania, opting instead to throw out the Trump campaign’s lawsuit that requested he block the state’s election results certification.

In a blistering opinion, Judge Matthew Brann denounced the Trump campaign’s lawyers for trying to toss millions of votes without evidence of any good reason to do so.

“One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption,” Brann wrote. “That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpaid in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence.”

He continued: “In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state. Our people, laws, and institutions demand more.”

The Trump campaign’s lawyers in the case, Rudy Giuliani and Marc Scaringi, argued earlier this week in a court filing that Pennsylvania election officials partook in “an improper scheme to favor Biden over Trump by counting improper votes.”

The court filing didn’t evidence of those claims, yet said they “will seek the remedy of Trump being declared the winner of the legal votes cast in Pennsylvania in the 2020 General Election, and, thus, the recipient of Pennsylvania’s electors.”

President-elect Joe Biden won Pennsylvania with 50% of the votes, compared to Trump’s 48.8%

The judge even chastised the Trump team’s chaotic approach to the case, noting that they “made multiple attempts at amending the pleadings, and have had attorneys both appear and withdraw in a matter of seventy-two hours.”

  The Trump administration quietly pushed out nearly a dozen prominent defense advisors after its Pentagon leadership purge

Giuliani and Scaringi were the only two attorneys still on the case after five previous lawyers quit the case. 

The opinion continued: “There have been at least two perceived discovery disputes, one oral argument, and a rude and ill-conceived voicemail which distracted the Court’s attention from the significant issues at hand.”

Read Brann’s full opinion below:


Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: We tested a machine that brews beer at the push of a button

…read more

Source:: Business Insider – Politics

(Visited 4 times, 1 visits today)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *